I didn't actually know what to expect, but the conference was dubbed as the 'largest MBA healthcare conference on the West Coast' so why not? It was quite a trek just getting up to Berkeley. I went into Consultant mode - took the earliest flight (6:30am) on Virgin America, rode the BART for an hour, and braved the cold rainy hike up to the Haas school. Why is Berkeley so hilly anyway?
By the time I got there I already missed the first keynote on healthcare reform. The first breakout session was very interesting - Realizing Comparative Effectiveness Research's (CER) Potential in the United States: Promoting Value while Encouraging Innovation. Having done work with the Health Economics team at GE Healthcare this summer, I understand the implication of placing a value on specific treatments. In some cases it is going to be decided that a treatment isn't worth the cost and potentially lead to restrictions on specific treatments. And when quote unquote death panel gets politicized and distorts the truth to the public this becomes a very sensitivity topic. The panel did a great job diving into the nuances of CER in finding the best therapeutic outcome for the patients. While I assumed CER was used to maintain cost in the system the panelists all agreed that CER has little to do with driving down costs and more focused on informed decision making based on clinical data. So while CER might not be driving down our spiraling healthcare costs, it's good to see how CER can help patients and physicans make better decisions by providing information on what therapies work best. Now the $286 million dollar question is how much is that worth?
The other panels all provided very thought-provoking perspectives. Jason Hwang from Innosight Institute who worked with Clayton Christensen on The Innovator's Prescription: A Disruptive Solution for Health Care dove into how we can potentially implement a disruptive solution for our broken healthcare system. He drew parallels to the computing industry and how we were able to take a centralized product, mainframes, and through disruptions created a decentralized solution that was more affordable and accessible to the consumers. By breaking down the current healthcare model into 3 specific tracks - fee for services, fee for outcome, and fee for membership - patients, physicians, hospitals, and healthcare providers can all start to dissect and disrupt the current model. But since each of them cannot make the changes on their own, Jason suggested an integrated healthcare provider like Kaiser might be the best possible candidate to lead the change. Not easy, but a well laid out plan, which is a good start.
After the event, there was a networking reception for some good drinks and mingling. There were a lot of companies represented at the reception and the Haas alums and students were very welcoming and hospitable to a fellow MBA from USC Marshall (I made sure I didn't talk about football).
Overall, very impressed and highly recommended next year for those in the healthcare industry. Well worth the trip!
When I was an undergrad I always thought networking was an awkward attempt at socializing and getting something you need from someone. It felt icky, sleazy, and a bit cheap. I thought I would just never engage in those tactics and I would never need to. The truth was I just wasn't very good at it and my mindset about networking was all wrong.

As the MBA chapter of my life comes to an end (I can't believe it is almost over! 2 years went by soooo quickly) so does my blogging about the USC Marshall MBA program. And as such, my blog is going to go through an extreme makeover to reflect my personal interest and the next stage of my life changing the world as a healthcare professional in the business world.


LinkedIn
Twitter